484 lines
27 KiB
TeX
484 lines
27 KiB
TeX
\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}
|
||
\IEEEoverridecommandlockouts
|
||
% The preceding line is only needed to identify funding in the first footnote. If that is unneeded, please comment it out.
|
||
\usepackage{cite}
|
||
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts}
|
||
\usepackage{algorithmic}
|
||
\usepackage{url}
|
||
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
||
\usepackage{placeins}
|
||
\usepackage{siunitx}
|
||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||
\usepackage{textcomp}
|
||
\usepackage{xcolor}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\def\BibTeX{{\rm B\kern-.05em{\sc i\kern-.025em b}\kern-.08em
|
||
T\kern-.1667em\lower.7ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX}}
|
||
\begin{document}
|
||
|
||
\title{
|
||
Design and Implementation of a High-Power Motor Controller for Bicycles
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
%\maketitle
|
||
|
||
|
||
\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Hugo Abescat}
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{GEI Department} \\
|
||
\textit{INSA Toulouse}\\
|
||
Toulouse, France \\
|
||
abescat@insa-toulouse.fr}
|
||
\and
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockN{Karima Attar}
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{GEI Department} \\
|
||
\textit{INSA Toulouse}\\
|
||
Toulouse, France \\
|
||
karima.attar@insa-toulouse.fr}
|
||
\and
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockN{Brage Flønæs Johnsen}
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{GEI Department} \\
|
||
\textit{INSA Toulouse}\\
|
||
Toulouse, France \\
|
||
johnse@insa-toulouse.fr}
|
||
\and
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockN{Oskar Orvik}
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{GEI Department} \\
|
||
\textit{INSA Toulouse}\\
|
||
Toulouse, France \\
|
||
orvik@insa-toulouse.fr}
|
||
\and
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockN{Julien Pavillon}
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{GEI Department} \\
|
||
\textit{INSA Toulouse}\\
|
||
Toulouse, France \\
|
||
pavillon@insa-toulouse.fr}
|
||
\and
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockN{Nolan Reynier Nomer}
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{GEI Department} \\
|
||
\textit{INSA Toulouse}\\
|
||
Toulouse, France \\
|
||
reynier-nome@insa-toulouse.fr}
|
||
\and
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockN{Aleksander Taban}
|
||
\IEEEauthorblockA{\textit{GEI Department} \\
|
||
\textit{INSA Toulouse}\\
|
||
Toulouse, France \\
|
||
taban@insa-toulouse.fr}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
\maketitle
|
||
|
||
\begin{abstract}
|
||
Electric bikes are becoming an increasingly attractive solution for transporting goods between short distances,
|
||
especially in city-wide infrastructures. However, most commercially available controllers rely on complex integrated
|
||
circuits making repair and local manufacturing difficult, particularly for organisations operating in
|
||
resource-constrained or low-tech environments. The Manufacture Autonome Décentralisée (MAD) is developing products
|
||
and solutions, particularly e-bikes, which are more repairable and sustainable. Previous studies have predominantly
|
||
focused on performance optimisation of Field Oriented Control (FOC) and trapezoidal commutation strategies, with limited
|
||
attention to repairability, component sourcing, and community-centred sustainability criteria. This project aims to
|
||
design, assemble, and develop a functional, low-tech and open-source motor controller for electric cargo bikes. The
|
||
current model uses an open-source motor control called VESC (Vedder Electronic Speed Controller) that allows precise
|
||
control of electric motors. The controller needs to be compatible with a VESC controller and easily locally repairable
|
||
by the MAD. By exploring the inner workings of the VESC project, modelling of the physical systems and the Printed
|
||
Circuit Board (PCB) we investigated the ways we could do it in another way. We acquired a VESC controller to compare our
|
||
system and a commercial product. Preliminary results demonstrate that the adapted VESC-based controller successfully
|
||
drives the target motor under both commutation strategies, and that positional control is achievable with the current
|
||
hardware configuration. Security vulnerabilities related to open Bluetooth access were identified. These findings
|
||
suggest that open-source, locally fabricated motor controllers can meet the functional requirements of electric cargo
|
||
bikes while significantly improving repairability.
|
||
\end{abstract}
|
||
|
||
\begin{IEEEkeywords}
|
||
VESC Project, Brushless DC motor, Field Oriented Control, Trapezoidal commutation, Low-Tech, e-bike.
|
||
\end{IEEEkeywords}
|
||
|
||
\section{Introduction}
|
||
The fast urbanization of global logistics has positioned electric cargo bikes as a primary solution. At the heart of
|
||
these vehicles is the motor controller. Current research and industry standards primarily focus on two methods of
|
||
commutation for the controller: Trapezoidal commutation and Field Oriented Control (FOC).
|
||
|
||
As motor controllers become smarter, they increasingly incorporate wireless connectivity for tuning and diagnostics.
|
||
Current research highlights that while Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and mobile app integration improve user experience,
|
||
they often introduce vulnerabilities. Open-source projects, in particular, must balance ease of access for community
|
||
developers with the need to secure the vehicle.
|
||
|
||
We also argue the need for general public's safety when it comes to these bikes, as it could be a danger to the traffic.
|
||
This is especially true when it comes to vehicules carrying a substantial load. This needs to be considered by the MAD,
|
||
where their responsibility and control begins and ends. Should there be a difference between the firmware loaded on a
|
||
product from the MAD than what is publicly available?
|
||
|
||
|
||
% ********************************************* RELATED WORK ***********************************************************
|
||
|
||
\section{Related Work}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Modeling of BLDC Motor}
|
||
The electromechanical model of a BLDC motor is foundational for understanding its behavior under different control
|
||
schemes. BLDC motors are categorized by their back-electromotive force (back-EMF) waveform: trapezoidal or sinusoidal.
|
||
This distinction is crucial, as the trapezoidal shape inherently leads to torque ripple when the supplied phase currents
|
||
are not perfectly aligned, directly influencing the choice and effectiveness of the control strategy
|
||
\cite{patil_analysis_2025}. For a BLDC motor with trapezoidal back-EMF, the electromagnetic torque is given by:
|
||
\[
|
||
T_e = \frac{e_a i_a + e_b i_b + e_c i_c}{\omega_m}
|
||
\]
|
||
where \( e_x \) is the back-EMF and \( i_x \) is the phase current \cite{li_quantitative_2019}. The classical d-q
|
||
reference frame model, ideal for sinusoidal machines, is less suitable for trapezoidal BLDC motors because it assumes
|
||
sinusoidal flux distribution. Phase-variable modeling in the natural (abc) frame is therefore more appropriate, as it
|
||
directly accounts for the non-sinusoidal, trapezoidal nature of the back-EMF and the associated harmonics
|
||
\cite{mohammd_taher_new_2021}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Trapezoidal Commutation (Six-Step Control) for BLDC Motors}
|
||
% Trapezoidal commutation, or six-step control, uses Hall-effect sensors to synchronize phase current switching every
|
||
% 120 electrical degrees.
|
||
Trapezoidal commutation, or Six-Step control, uses bipolar conduction, with two motor phases conducting at any time and
|
||
current commutation occurring every 120 electrical degrees \cite{gieras_modern_2023}. As commutation depends on rotor
|
||
position, Six-Step control requires either position sensors (e.g. Hall sensors, encoders, or resolvers) or sensorless
|
||
estimation based on back-EMF detection or observers \cite{gieras_modern_2023, gasc_conception_2004}. This method is
|
||
renowned for its simplicity of implementation and low hardware cost \cite{bhatiya_bldc_2024}. It enables effective
|
||
torque control but introduces significant torque ripple during commutation events, especially under high load
|
||
\cite{jomsa-nga_torque_2024}. This ripple generates noise, increases mechanical stress, and reduces overall efficiency
|
||
\cite{mohammd_taher_new_2021}. Although PWM techniques can mitigate this ripple, they do not completely eliminate it
|
||
\cite{li_quantitative_2019}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Field-Oriented Control (FOC) for BLDC Motors}
|
||
FOC is a vector control strategy that decouples the stator flux and torque components. It transforms three-phase
|
||
currents into orthogonal \( I_d \) and \( I_q \) components, enabling precise torque control and significant ripple
|
||
reduction \cite{jomsa-nga_torque_2024}. FOC is particularly effective for BLDC motors with sinusoidal back-EMF but can
|
||
also be applied to trapezoidal back-EMF motors, albeit with less impressive ripple suppression results
|
||
\cite{li_quantitative_2019}. It requires greater computational power and more precise position sensors (e.g. encoders).
|
||
Comparative analysis shows that FOC yields a more stable stator current profile and significantly reduces torque
|
||
variations compared to trapezoidal control \cite{patil_analysis_2025}.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Comparative Analysis: FOC vs. Trapezoidal for Light Electric Vehicles}
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{Torque Ripple and User Comfort}
|
||
Firstly, torque ripple can be reduced for both control methods by selecting appropriate motor parameters, such as the
|
||
number of stator slots and rotor poles \cite{gasc_conception_2004}.
|
||
FOC substantially reduces torque ripple compared to Six-Step control, directly enhancing ride comfort and minimizing
|
||
vibrations. Experimental results show a torque ripple of \SI{18.38}{\percent} for FOC versus \SI{35.67}{\percent} for
|
||
Six-Step control at 500~rpm \cite{jomsa-nga_torque_2024}.
|
||
Commutation torque ripple (CTR), prominent in Six-Step control, can be specifically targeted and mitigated using
|
||
advanced control techniques like Model Predictive Control (MPC) while retaining the fundamental simplicity of
|
||
trapezoidal commutation \cite{mohammd_taher_new_2021}.
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{Energy Efficiency}
|
||
FOC optimizes torque per ampere (MTPA), improving efficiency at low loads. Six-Step control exhibits lower switching
|
||
losses at high speeds \cite{li_quantitative_2019}.
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{Complexity, Cost, and Low-Tech Suitability}
|
||
|
||
Six-Step control is inherently simpler, cheaper, and more robust, making it a prime candidate for low-tech applications.
|
||
Research focused on reducing propulsion system costs proposes simplified hardware topologies, such as 4-switch inverters
|
||
(instead of 6) coupled with direct current control strategies, maintaining acceptable performance while significantly
|
||
lowering hardware costs \cite{lee_advanced_2001}. FOC, while superior in performance, is more complex to implement and
|
||
carries higher hardware costs (sensors, processing power).
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{Dynamic Response}
|
||
|
||
FOC provides faster response times and better load disturbance rejection \cite{jomsa-nga_torque_2024}.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Research gap}
|
||
Despite this progress, limited research has examined the adaptation of open-source motor controllers to LowTech and
|
||
repairability constraints. To date, researchers have not addressed the challenge of designing a controller that can
|
||
be locally fabricated, repaired with standard components, and secured against unauthorised wireless access requirements
|
||
that are critical for decentralised, community-operated fleets.
|
||
|
||
\section{Aim and Research Objectives}
|
||
This work presents the design and implementation of a motor control system for electric bicycles and cargo transport
|
||
applications developed within the context of the Manufacture Autonome Décentralisée (MAD) initiative at INSA Toulouse.
|
||
The main objective is to develop a modular, open-source, and locally manufacturable control architecture adapted to
|
||
low-cost electric mobility systems.
|
||
|
||
To achieve this, the project is structured into four main technical contributions.
|
||
|
||
First, a low-cost motor controller is designed based on a six-step (trapezoidal) commutation strategy. The objective is
|
||
to eliminate the need for a microcontroller by relying exclusively on discrete MOSFETs and standard electronic
|
||
components, thereby improving repairability, accessibility, and ease of local manufacturing.
|
||
|
||
Second, a high-performance controller based on Field-Oriented Control (FOC) is developed using an STM32 microcontroller
|
||
platform. This implementation leverages and adapts the open-source VESC firmware to ensure compatibility with the
|
||
selected hardware while enabling advanced motor control capabilities.
|
||
|
||
Third, the security of the wireless communication interface is investigated, with a focus on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
|
||
vulnerabilities. A Flipper Zero device is used as a diagnostic tool to evaluate potential attack surfaces and identify
|
||
weaknesses in the communication layer.
|
||
|
||
Finally, a dynamic model of the bicycle–cargo system is developed to improve rider experience.
|
||
The objective is to minimize the perceived additional effort when towing a cargo cart. This is achieved through a
|
||
PID-based (Proportional–Integral–Derivative) control strategy combined with distance sensing, allowing adaptive
|
||
assistance based on system dynamics.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Hardware-Based Six-Step Commutation Controller}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{STM32-Based Field-Oriented Control Motor Drive}
|
||
|
||
|
||
% ************************************** SOFTWARE AND CONNECTIVITY *****************************************************
|
||
|
||
\section{Software and Connectivity}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{BLE Compatibility With the VESC}
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{First Experiment}
|
||
VESC-controllers are not necessarily equipped with Bluetooth-modules by default. Often, it is necessary to add a
|
||
BLE-module. A standard HC-05 bluetooth-module compatible with arduino is a great way to send and recieve
|
||
bluetooth-packets from a host, e.g. a mobile phone, via a bridge translating the bluetooth packets to the UART protocol.
|
||
This could be demonstrated using a ESP8622's standard library with said module, by letting us send characters from one
|
||
device to another.
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{HC-05 and the VESC}
|
||
By flashing the VESC firmware on a discovery-card and connecting the HC-05 module to the PB10 and PB11-pins, which are
|
||
the Rx and Tx-pins for the STM32F4xx chip, we discovered that the setup for the bluetooth module was not available in
|
||
the VESC tool. The inherent BLE capabilities is an important limitation to consider when designing a VESC system.
|
||
We learned therefore that the HC-05 is not originally adapted for BLE. The need for a bridge also adds on complexity
|
||
and cost, in the form of extra components and another device to maintain the code of. For the future, choosing a
|
||
bluetooth module supporting BLE will be the easiest solution. Preferably a module fitting the communication connector on
|
||
the cheap FOCer project\cite{b1} could facilitate the relevancy of the PCB project with a microcontroller.
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{BLE Vulnerability}
|
||
Bluetooth could be a vulnerability to a VESC if it is to be used as a controller in real-time, as the controller could
|
||
be jammed. Our test with the Flipper Zero shows the disfunctionnality of Bluetooth with different use cases.
|
||
We experienced with the jamming of a bluetooth speaker that the music completely stopped. It could also be investigated
|
||
how the connection to the VESC could be modified using the vesc tool. We will touch more on the accessability of the
|
||
code within the vesc tool sooner.
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Code integrity}
|
||
\subsubsection{Context}
|
||
As the project is open source, and the code is freely accessible, there should be no reason to hide the code. It could
|
||
however be reasonable to protect the code from changes which could hurt other people. Changing following parameters
|
||
should at least come with a disclaimer and clearly state the dangers possible by proceeding with said changes. We
|
||
have in mind the maximum speed permitted and the power available to the motors.
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{LispBM extraction}
|
||
We caugth word that the lisp code for the VESC used by Maillon mobility was easy to extract. By building an older
|
||
firmware with the Maillon mobility software, we observed this by going to the lispBM tab and clicking read. It's up to
|
||
the MAD if they would like to reinforce this mechanism. A modification on a parameter and then clicking upload allowed
|
||
us to easily change the speed limit. This could bring up a public danger. This raises questions on the use of the MAD's
|
||
equipment which is in a traffic friendly manner.
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{LispBM Code}
|
||
When we flashed newer firmware from the project made by Benjamin Vedder\cite{b1}, we also observed some difficulties in
|
||
uploading the lispBM script taken from the one on firmware version 6.06. This could indicate that there needs to be
|
||
further maintenance of the code in order to get the software up to speed. This needs to be documented better for someone
|
||
to continue the project. This could be a good investment for the MAD as well in the context of training for the people
|
||
working on the motor control part of the e-bike.
|
||
|
||
This documentation could be as simple as referencing the relevant parts of the lispBM documentation \cite{b2}
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{Proposed Solution}
|
||
This risk could be patched by developing a VESC application for the VESC controller or using a binary. This is a
|
||
solution which is less open source, but which is make unlawful use of the material harder. The application could be
|
||
created using C and use an algorithm known by the MAD in order to securise the access to someone to change the parameters
|
||
only if they are the MAD certified personnel. This encryption would preferably be reduced to the most essential settings
|
||
in order to align with what our impression of the philosophy of the MAD would be.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{VESC Compiling}
|
||
As mentionned, we have been able to compile the VESC tool and the VESC firmware. This firmware has been put onto an
|
||
STM32F4xx Discovery card. This poses several obstacles for our progress on the topic of cybersecurity. We will however
|
||
summarise what we have learned for you and propose some additional work for the future. The challenges we encountered
|
||
were the following: The lack of bluetooth capabilities. We did not have a module with BLE either. We had access to a
|
||
HC-05 module, but that only allows for a normal bluetooth protocol and would require further work on a bridge to UART
|
||
by using an esp8622 that we had as well. We propose that the next group has access to a VESC controller from the
|
||
beginning, as well as a motor we could control. This could be in cooperation with the MAD, as the MAD could propose
|
||
some models they're interested in.
|
||
|
||
We also found that the information on the VESC is scattered around the internet. The ressources is also sometimes
|
||
based on a debian-based linux system which adds more work for someone using another distribution of linux. This could
|
||
hinder the implementation facility for new users. We struggeled particularly with the Qt packages for positioning and
|
||
gamepad. We would therefore recommend the use of a debian-based linux system for the computer working with the VESC
|
||
for the the MAD associates.
|
||
|
||
|
||
% ************************************ DYNAMIC MODELLING ***************************************************************
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Dynamic Modelling and Control of the Bicycle–Cargo System}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Dynamic System Modelling}
|
||
|
||
The studied system consists of a bicycle towing a cargo cart through a rigid mechanical linkage. This link is only used
|
||
for steering guidance and does not contribute to the traction force. The main objective is to ensure that the rider
|
||
perceives minimal additional effort, such that the overall behaviour remains similar to riding a standard bicycle.
|
||
|
||
From a control perspective, the rider provides a reference motion in terms of speed and position, while the cargo cart
|
||
is expected to follow this reference with minimal delay. The position error between the bicycle and the cargo cart is
|
||
computed using a distance sensor, which provides feedback relative to an equilibrium state.
|
||
|
||
The cargo cart is modelled as the plant of the system. Its rotational dynamics are described using the fundamental
|
||
equation of rotational motion:
|
||
|
||
\begin{equation*}
|
||
\sum \tau = J_{\Delta} \times \dot{\omega}
|
||
\end{equation*}
|
||
where $\tau$ is the total torque applied to the system, $J_{\Delta}$ is the equivalent moment of inertia, and $\omega$
|
||
is the angular velocity.
|
||
|
||
The total torque is composed of the motor torque $\tau_m$ and a friction torque modelled as:
|
||
|
||
\begin{equation*}
|
||
\tau_f = -f \times \omega
|
||
\end{equation*}
|
||
where $f$ is the viscous friction coefficient.
|
||
|
||
The resulting dynamic equation becomes:
|
||
|
||
\begin{equation*}
|
||
J_{\Delta} \dot{\omega} = \tau_m - f \omega
|
||
\end{equation*}
|
||
|
||
In the Laplace domain, this leads to:
|
||
\begin{equation*}
|
||
\omega(s) = \frac{\tau_m(s)}{J_{\Delta} s + f}
|
||
\end{equation*}
|
||
|
||
Since the linear velocity is related to angular velocity by the wheel radius $R$, we obtain:
|
||
|
||
\begin{equation*}
|
||
v(s) = R \times \omega(s)
|
||
\end{equation*}
|
||
|
||
Thus, the transfer function between motor torque and linear velocity is:
|
||
\begin{equation*}
|
||
\frac{v(s)}{\tau_m(s)} = \frac{R}{J_{\Delta} s + f}
|
||
\end{equation*}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{PI-Based Control Strategy}
|
||
\label{subsec:Simulink_model}
|
||
Based on this model, a Simulink representation of the system was developed. The controlled system includes a feedback
|
||
loop using a PI (Proportional-Integral) controller in order to regulate the position error between the bicycle and the cargo cart.
|
||
|
||
Since the reference input is a ramp signal (representing the bicycle position over time), an integral action is required
|
||
to ensure zero steady-state error and accurate tracking of the reference trajectory.
|
||
|
||
The closed-loop Simulink model of the system is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:simulink-closedloop}.
|
||
|
||
The control error is defined as the difference between a desired relative position and the measured displacement between
|
||
the bicycle and the cargo cart:
|
||
\begin{equation*}
|
||
e(t) = e_{\text{ref}} - (x_{\text{bike}} - x_{\text{cart}})
|
||
\end{equation*}
|
||
where $e_{\text{ref}} = \SI{-0.5}{\meter}$ represents the desired equilibrium offset between both systems.
|
||
|
||
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
||
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./Figures/sys_dyn_matlab.png}
|
||
\caption{Closed-loop model of the bicycle–cargo system with PI control.}
|
||
\label{fig:simulink-closedloop}
|
||
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Control Architecture Exploration}
|
||
|
||
|
||
% ******************************** RESULTS **************************************************************************
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Results}
|
||
|
||
\subsection{Bicycle-Cargo System Control Results}
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{Simulation Results}
|
||
The closed-loop Simulink model presented in the subsection~\ref{subsec:Simulink_model} was used to evaluate the
|
||
performance of the proposed PI-based (Proportional-Integral) control strategy.
|
||
|
||
Figure~\ref{fig:tracking-error} shows the evolution of the tracking error between the bicycle and the cargo cart during
|
||
simulation. The response exhibits an initial transient phase followed by a progressive convergence toward the desired
|
||
equilibrium position, demonstrating stable closed-loop behaviour and satisfactory tracking performance.
|
||
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./Figures/error_fig.png}
|
||
\caption{Position tracking error between bicycle and cargo cart.}
|
||
\label{fig:tracking-error}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
\subsubsection{Experimental Load Characterization}
|
||
|
||
|
||
% ******************************** DISCUSSION **************************************************************************
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Discussion}
|
||
This project could be seen as an introduction to the VESC project for someone who don't know about it from beforehand,
|
||
the challenges the new users face during setup, as well as a demand for clear expectations concerning documentation
|
||
on the subject. The project the MAD is leading should probably not be a fork of the project, as the project is still
|
||
in development.
|
||
|
||
As a final note, this proved to be a project which could easily be developed into several different projects in
|
||
different fields. Some projects could be continued later on as a different PIR subject, other could be proposed to
|
||
later years in different spesialisations like TLS SEC, ESPE. Our thoughts on the following projects that could be
|
||
explored are the following.
|
||
|
||
The fabrication line for electronics is globalised. This is okay in a stable world, but it could be a problem in a world
|
||
full of instability, be it war, blockages, or tarifs. The idea of opening a spesialisation in cooperation with AIME came
|
||
up as an idea.
|
||
|
||
For TLS SEC the subject could be the design for a fitting mechanism to restrict certain priveligies to certified
|
||
personnel that could be used in the C programming language. Later down the line we could also see the possibility to
|
||
analyse the Bluetooth frames in order to manipulate them in order to change important parameters.
|
||
|
||
The continuation on the PCB could be a subject fitting an ESPE spesialisation.
|
||
|
||
The proposition of and supply of a vesc system to play with and troubleshoot could be a good rule of thumb, which
|
||
allows for a quicker start and gives among other things an idea of the budget and the supply line used by a entity
|
||
in the sector. Proposing a visit could also be one way to familiarise students with the association.
|
||
|
||
What should be a clear conclusion from our test with the jammer is that a controlles based on Bluetooth alone should be
|
||
avoided when possible and practical. Examples where this could be relevant include electric skateboards, as cables could
|
||
impose a tripping hazard. There, an encapsulation of an encrypted control frame could be an thought.
|
||
|
||
|
||
\section{Conclusion/Summary}
|
||
|
||
%\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||
%%\centerline{\includegraphics{fig1.png}}
|
||
%caption{Example of a figure caption.}
|
||
%\label{fig}
|
||
%\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
%Figure Labels: Use 8 point Times New Roman for Figure labels. Use words
|
||
%rather than symbols or abbreviations when writing Figure axis labels to
|
||
%avoid confusing the reader. As an example, write the quantity
|
||
%``Magnetization'', or ``Magnetization, M'', not just ``M''. If including
|
||
%units in the label, present them within parentheses. Do not label axes only
|
||
%with units. In the example, write ``Magnetization (A/m)'' or ``Magnetization
|
||
%\{A[m(1)]\}'', not just ``A/m''. Do not label axes with a ratio of
|
||
%quantities and units. For example, write ``Temperature (K)'', not
|
||
%``Temperature/K''.
|
||
|
||
\section*{Acknowledgment}
|
||
|
||
The authors acknowledge the use of generative AI tools during this project, both for the development work and for
|
||
writing this paper.
|
||
|
||
AI was used as a helper in several parts of the project. This includes support for understanding and structuring
|
||
technical ideas, and giving suggestions during the development of different subsystems. It was also used to help with
|
||
writing, rephrasing, and improving clarity in the report.
|
||
|
||
However, all final decisions, implementations, and validations were done by the authors. The AI outputs were always
|
||
checked, corrected when needed, and adapted based on reliable technical sources and our own experiments and
|
||
understanding of the system.
|
||
|
||
We consider AI as a useful tool to speed up thinking and writing, but not as a source of final technical truth.
|
||
Everything related to design choices, analysis, and results was verified and fully controlled by the authors.
|
||
|
||
The use of AI tools in this work follows the IEEE guidelines for generative AI usage in publications.
|
||
|
||
%Please number citations consecutively within brackets \cite{b1}. The
|
||
%sentence punctuation follows the bracket \cite{b2}. Refer simply to the reference
|
||
%number, as in \cite{b3}---do not use ``Ref. \cite{b3}'' or ``reference \cite{b3}'' except at
|
||
%the beginning of a sentence: ``Reference \cite{b3} was the first $\ldots$''
|
||
|
||
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
||
\bibliography{PIR_MadMax3}
|
||
|
||
|
||
\end{document}
|